I obtained an order discharging a $129,652.82 mechanic’s lien filed by George Stoll Construction Inc. against my clients’ Rockland County home. In its October 13, 2026 decision, the Supreme Court granted our petition and directed the County Clerk to discharge the lien of record. The result demonstrates a practical way to challenge an expired lien without first having to try the underlying construction dispute.
What is necessary to preserve a lien
A mechanic’s lien generally lasts one year from filing unless properly preserved under New York Lien Law § 17. A contractor ordinarily must timely commence a lien foreclosure action and file a notice of pendency, or obtain a valid extension. For property improved or to be improved with a single-family dwelling, an extension requires a court order. Other qualifying properties permit an initial extension by filing with the county clerk. Related foreclosure proceedings may also affect whether a lien remains in force.
The key question is whether the contractor completed the steps necessary to continue the lien. A payment demand or an ongoing construction dispute does not, by itself, preserve lien rights.
Why the contractor failed here
The contractor did not timely commence a lien foreclosure action or secure an order extending its lien. Although it applied for an extension, it twice failed to comply with the court’s directions to file a Notice of Petition and proof of service. The extension proceeding was dismissed.
The contractor argued that the homeowners already knew about the dispute and that its delay caused no prejudice. The court rejected those arguments as grounds to deny discharge. Knowledge of a dispute did not excuse failure to comply with the court’s directions.
The takeaway for property owners
Before treating a lien as something you must pay to remove, review its filing date, any extension, and the foreclosure record. If the contractor failed to preserve the lien, discharge may be available under Lien Law § 19(2). That was the basis for our successful petition to discharge this $129,652.82 lien.
Discharging a lien does not necessarily resolve the underlying payment dispute. Here, the court did not decide whether the construction charges were owed or whether the lien was willfully exaggerated. However, since the lien was discharged, the contractor does lose some significant leverage in the underlying lawsuit.
Decision: Sheynin v. George Stoll Construction Inc., Supreme Court, Rockland County, Index No. 033604/2026, October 13, 2026, NYSCEF Doc. No. 21. Legal references: New York Lien Law §§ 17 and 19(2).
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
